🔗 Share this article

The iPhone maker may have to permit competitors to operate their own app stores on iPhones in the UK, after a ruling from the competition regulator.

This represents a significant change to Apple's well-known "closed system" where applications can only be installed from the company's official marketplace.

But the UK competition watchdog has designated both Apple and Google as having "strategic market status" - indicating they have a lot of power over mobile platforms.

Regulatory Assessment

The CMA said the tech firms "may be limiting progress and competition".

But the regulator emphasized it did not "find or assume wrongdoing" from the firms.

"Mobile applications generates 1.5% of the UK's GDP and sustains around 400,000 jobs, which is why it's essential these markets work well for business," commented a top executive from the competition authority.

Approximately ninety to one hundred percent of British smartphones run on Apple or Google's mobile platforms, creating what the authority calls an "effective duopoly".

Based on current data, nearly half of UK mobile owners own an Apple device - which runs the iOS operating system - with the vast majority of the rest using Google's Android.

The Company's Reaction

The CMA's investigation examined how dominant the companies' own apps are versus competitors - as well as their web applications and operating systems.

It is unknown what modifications the authority will look to request, but previously it published roadmaps detailing potential measures it could take.

These include requiring it to be easier for people to switch between iOS and Android phones, and for both companies to rank apps "fairly and openly" in their marketplaces.

Apple particularly may be required to permit third-party marketplaces on its products, and let people to install apps directly from developer sites.

This would follow a similar ruling in the EU, which previously took action against the company for restrictive practices.

The technology firm cautioned the UK could lose access to getting new features - as has occurred in the EU - which the organization blames on strict rules.

For instance, some AI features which have been launched in other parts of the world are not available in the EU.

"We faces fierce competition in every sector where we operate, and we strive continuously to create the best products, solutions and customer interface," the company said in a release.

"The UK's adoption of European regulations would undermine that, leaving users with weaker privacy and security, delayed access to new features, and a divided, more complicated experience."

Google's Position

Android users can currently use third-party app stores - though critics say they are not as user-friendly as Google's own Play Store.

The CMA's roadmap said Google may have to "modify the interface" of installing applications straight from online sources, as well as "remove user frictions" when using alternative app stores.

"We simply do not see the justification for today's designation decision," a Google policy executive stated.

The representative said "most" of Google device owners use third-party platforms or download apps directly from a developer's website, and asserted there is a much wider selection of applications offered for Google device owners compared to those on iOS products.

"Currently available are twenty-four thousand Android phone models from 1,300 phone manufacturers globally, facing strong rivalry from Apple's platform in the United Kingdom," the spokesperson continued.

Android is an freely available software, which means developers can use and build on top of it for free.

Google argues this means it promotes competition.

But consumer groups said restrictions on these firms' dominance in different nations "currently assist enterprises to develop and providing customers more choice".

"Their dominance is now causing real harm by limiting options for users and competition for companies," commented a consumer advocate.